Ariel Levy is just plain mean in her assessment of Silda Wall Spitzer, and the ugly bind in which she now finds herself. “…she will not have the consolation of her own career as she comes to terms with the man she gave it up for … it exposes the risks women take when they make certain kinds of choices — things that, after Silda, they might not think are safe.” First of all, picking on stay-at-home moms — even privileged ones like Silda — is like picking on nuns: they are undervalued cost-savings centers doing god’s work within a chauvinist system.
And second, nobody with career ambition views staying home as “safe.” More likely, she is tortured daily by her decision, constantly calculating how she will eventually re-enter her profession as she devotes her present life to food prep and playdates. So, why do smart women like Silda stay home? Naturally, there is a measure of “not my husband.” But more than that, becoming a parent hopefully makes you a little less selfish. Committing yourself to your family should not be grounds for smug crucifixion.
Whether or not Silda dumps the Luv Guv, as Levy encourages her to do, we hope she gets a figurehead position at her old law firm and uses it as a bully pulpit from which to campaign vociferously for truly family-friendly flex-time options for the rest of us. It wouldn’t stop the adultery but it would certainly allow women to hedge their bets.